|
A good indicator of a team's quality is how the opening odds rate them. You
didn't know Vegas had
favorites? All you see in the odds are the expected margins of victory. How can
you compare two teams
if they aren't playing this week and you have no odds to go by? That's easy.
I've done it for you.
This chart aligns the teams according to how the odds makers set the margins
of victory week
by week.
Though there are problems - such as the wave created when, for example, a
heavily-favored team loses -
most changes are slight. The ranking is very interesting as you can see which
teams the odds makers favor.
Surprising, isn't it? Yet if you go to Todd Beck's Prediction
Tracker, you
will see that they are very accurate
year after year.
How can you argue?
NCAA Ranking
NFL
January 13, 2009
The first column indicates the imaginary rating that the oddsmakers
would give the teams based upon the point spread and considering
a simple three point home field advantage. The second column
indicates how much the rating increased or decreased from last week.
A 0.00 change probably means the team isn't playing this week or
the opening line was delayed, in which case you can figure out near
what it should be. The change does not indicate how a team played
last week but an average of how they and their next opponent played.
| 1 |
Dallas |
76.36 |
0.00 |
| 2 |
Arizona |
76.21 |
0.00 |
| 3 |
New Orleans |
75.29 |
1.58 |
| 4 |
Minnesota |
74.79 |
-1.57 |
| 5 |
Philadelphia |
74.65 |
0.00 |
| 6 |
Indianapolis |
74.34 |
-0.57 |
| 7 |
San Diego |
74.27 |
0.00 |
| 8 |
New England |
74.20 |
0.00 |
| 9 |
Houston |
73.79 |
0.00 |
| 10 |
Green Bay |
73.78 |
0.00 |
| 11 |
Tennessee |
72.68 |
0.00 |
| 12 |
Cincinnati |
72.17 |
0.00 |
| 13 |
Pittsburgh |
72.15 |
0.00 |
| 14 |
Baltimore |
71.41 |
0.00 |
| 15 |
San Francisco |
71.11 |
0.00 |
| 16 |
Miami |
70.88 |
0.00 |
| 17 |
Denver |
70.74 |
0.00 |
| 18 |
Giants |
70.59 |
0.00 |
| 19 |
Washington |
70.36 |
0.00 |
| 20 |
Jets |
70.34 |
0.57 |
| 21 |
Atlanta |
69.89 |
0.00 |
| 22 |
Chicago |
67.75 |
0.00 |
| 23 |
Carolina |
66.56 |
0.00 |
| 24 |
Jacksonville |
66.13 |
0.00 |
| 25 |
Cleveland |
64.63 |
0.00 |
| 26 |
Seattle |
64.18 |
0.00 |
| 27 |
Buffalo |
64.14 |
0.00 |
| 28 |
Tampa Bay |
63.89 |
0.00 |
| 29 |
Detroit |
61.34 |
0.00 |
| 30 |
Oakland |
61.10 |
0.00 |
| 31 |
Kansas City |
60.74 |
0.00 |
| 32 |
Saint Louis |
60.11 |
0.00 |
NCAA
15 December 2009
The first column indicates the imaginary rating that the oddsmakers
would give the teams based upon the point spread and considering
a simple three point home field advantage. The second column
indicates how much the rating increased or decreased from last week.
A 0.00 change probably means the team isn't playing this week or
the opening line was delayed, in which case you can figure out near
what it should be. The change does not indicate how a team played
last week but an average of how they and their next opponent played.
I'll tell you what I'm thinking. They've had Texas well ahead of Alabama
all season. Suddenly, there's a seven-point shift. My analysis is that
Vegas is planning to make a killing off all the Alabama hype.
| 1 |
Alabama |
134.56 |
7.22 |
| 2 |
Florida |
132.59 |
-2.75 |
| 3 |
Texas |
130.56 |
-7.22 |
| 4 |
TCU |
126.87 |
-1.11 |
| 5 |
Oregon |
125.91 |
2.75 |
| 6 |
Oklahoma |
125.73 |
0.86 |
| 7 |
Ohio State |
123.91 |
-2.74 |
| 8 |
Texas Tech |
122.94 |
0.35 |
| 9 |
Boise State |
122.87 |
1.11 |
| 10 |
Penn State |
122.63 |
1.34 |
| 11 |
Cincinnati |
122.09 |
2.76 |
| 12 |
Mississippi |
120.93 |
0.72 |
| 13 |
Georgia Tech |
120.77 |
-0.74 |
| 14 |
Virginia Tech |
120.59 |
0.54 |
| 15 |
LSU |
119.63 |
-1.33 |
| 16 |
USC |
118.96 |
-2.20 |
| 17 |
Stanford |
118.73 |
-0.85 |
| 18 |
Miami |
118.47 |
1.27 |
| 19 |
Oklahoma State |
118.43 |
-0.71 |
| 20 |
Arkansas |
118.15 |
0.19 |
| 21 |
Clemson |
118.07 |
0.56 |
| 22 |
Oregon State |
118.07 |
-0.09 |
| 23 |
Arizona |
117.72 |
1.56 |
| 24 |
Nebraska |
117.72 |
-1.56 |
| 25 |
Iowa |
117.27 |
0.75 |
| 26 |
Tennessee |
116.59 |
-0.54 |
| 27 |
South Carolina |
116.37 |
0.36 |
| 28 |
Pittsburgh |
116.20 |
-1.13 |
| 29 |
BYU |
115.57 |
0.10 |
| 30 |
Missouri |
115.52 |
-1.27 |
| 31 |
Georgia |
115.49 |
1.99 |
| 32 |
Nevada |
115.02 |
0.31 |
| 33 |
Houston |
114.83 |
2.50 |
| 34 |
Florida State |
114.82 |
-0.61 |
| 35 |
Michigan State |
114.44 |
-0.35 |
| 36 |
North Carolina |
114.20 |
1.13 |
| 37 |
California |
114.13 |
-0.66 |
| 38 |
West Virginia |
113.82 |
0.61 |
| 39 |
Connecticut |
113.37 |
-0.36 |
| 40 |
Notre Dame |
112.58 |
0.00 |
| 41 |
Kansas State |
112.26 |
0.00 |
| 42 |
Auburn |
112.18 |
-1.06 |
| 43 |
C. Michigan |
112.09 |
-0.63 |
| 44 |
Purdue |
112.04 |
0.00 |
| 45 |
Wisconsin |
111.97 |
-1.26 |
| 46 |
Boston College |
111.96 |
2.21 |
| 47 |
Utah |
111.63 |
0.66 |
| 48 |
Wake Forest |
111.58 |
0.00 |
| 49 |
UCLA |
111.53 |
-0.07 |
| 50 |
Texas A&M |
111.49 |
-1.99 |
| 51 |
Michigan |
110.65 |
0.00 |
| 52 |
Tulsa |
110.61 |
0.00 |
| 53 |
Kentucky |
110.57 |
-0.56 |
| 54 |
Mississippi State |
110.21 |
0.00 |
| 55 |
Rutgers |
110.20 |
-0.01 |
| 56 |
South Florida |
109.73 |
0.50 |
| 57 |
Navy |
109.52 |
1.27 |
| 58 |
Kansas |
109.29 |
0.00 |
| 59 |
Southern Miss |
109.27 |
0.80 |
| 60 |
Arizona State |
109.22 |
0.00 |
| 61 |
Fresno State |
108.71 |
1.52 |
| 62 |
Colorado |
108.57 |
0.00 |
| 63 |
East Carolina |
108.15 |
-0.18 |
| 64 |
Air Force |
107.83 |
-2.50 |
| 65 |
Northwestern |
107.68 |
1.07 |
| 66 |
Troy State |
107.59 |
0.64 |
| 67 |
Minnesota |
107.54 |
1.02 |
| 68 |
Temple |
107.53 |
0.08 |
| 69 |
Illinois |
107.19 |
0.00 |
| 70 |
Indiana |
106.54 |
0.00 |
| 71 |
C. Florida |
106.20 |
0.01 |
| 72 |
NC State |
106.07 |
0.00 |
| 73 |
Iowa State |
106.04 |
-1.02 |
| 74 |
Washington |
105.79 |
0.00 |
| 75 |
Northern Illinois |
105.23 |
-0.49 |
| 76 |
Ohio |
104.79 |
4.34 |
| 77 |
Duke |
104.58 |
0.00 |
| 78 |
Baylor |
104.09 |
0.00 |
| 79 |
Virginia |
104.05 |
0.00 |
| 80 |
Middle Tenn |
103.27 |
-0.79 |
| 81 |
Vanderbilt |
102.98 |
0.00 |
| 82 |
SMU |
102.02 |
-0.31 |
| 83 |
Louisiana Tech |
101.91 |
0.00 |
| 84 |
Louisville |
101.14 |
0.00 |
| 85 |
Marshall |
100.79 |
-4.34 |
| 86 |
Bowling Green |
100.54 |
-2.45 |
| 87 |
Maryland |
100.25 |
0.00 |
| 88 |
UAB |
100.19 |
0.00 |
| 89 |
Idaho |
99.54 |
2.45 |
| 90 |
Buffalo |
99.41 |
0.00 |
| 91 |
UTEP |
99.13 |
0.00 |
| 92 |
W. Michigan |
98.46 |
0.00 |
| 93 |
Toledo |
97.49 |
0.00 |
| 94 |
Hawaii |
97.23 |
0.00 |
| 95 |
Utah State |
97.09 |
0.00 |
| 96 |
La-Monroe |
97.06 |
0.00 |
| 97 |
Syracuse |
96.76 |
0.00 |
| 98 |
San Diego State |
96.60 |
0.00 |
| 99 |
UNLV |
96.60 |
0.00 |
| 100 |
Arkansas State |
96.54 |
0.00 |
| 101 |
Wyoming |
95.71 |
-1.52 |
| 102 |
Memphis |
95.61 |
0.00 |
| 103 |
Florida Atlantic |
95.30 |
0.00 |
| 104 |
Colorado State |
95.23 |
0.00 |
| 105 |
Kent State |
94.91 |
0.00 |
| 106 |
Army |
94.75 |
0.00 |
| 107 |
Florida Int'l |
94.30 |
0.00 |
| 108 |
Akron |
93.99 |
0.00 |
| 109 |
La-Lafayette |
93.95 |
0.00 |
| 110 |
North Texas |
92.52 |
0.00 |
| 111 |
Miami OH |
92.50 |
0.00 |
| 112 |
Rice |
91.68 |
0.00 |
| 113 |
Ball State |
90.96 |
0.00 |
| 114 |
New Mexico |
88.98 |
0.00 |
| 115 |
San Jose State |
88.91 |
0.00 |
| 116 |
Tulane |
87.83 |
0.00 |
| 117 |
Washington State |
84.81 |
0.00 |
| 118 |
W. Kentucky |
83.54 |
0.00 |
| 119 |
E. Michigan |
82.49 |
0.00 |
| 120 |
NM State |
80.76 |
0.00 |
How to Gamble
I neither promote nor discourage gambling. However, many people ruin their lives
doing it. Here is a formula you can follow to make sure you aren't one of them.
- Take a certain amount of money you won't miss.
- Pick some games using whatever method or service you prefer.
- Never, ever bet more than ten per cent on any single game. Ever.
- Never bet more than half your money on any particular day. Hold at least
half for next time.
- When the money runs out, quit. Seek another profession.
It's that simple.
|